Thursday, June 16, 2011

randy jackson the jacksons

images hair randy jackson the randy jackson the jacksons. randy jackson the jacksons a
  • randy jackson the jacksons a


  • quizzer
    07-30 07:36 PM
    The attorney informed us that both our EAD's were received today.

    The point here is the original ead expiry date was 10/15/2008. The new EAD expiry is 07/15/2010 and not 10/14/2010.

    Its validity is not 2 years from the original expiry but 2 years from the current approval date.

    Are others getting it the same way?

    Thanks




    wallpaper randy jackson the jacksons a randy jackson the jacksons. randy jackson the jacksons.
  • randy jackson the jacksons.


  • newbie2020
    09-27 10:57 AM
    thats a good idea, Instead of starting at 200K raffle, Start small may be 10K raffle or 20K raffle, that would be a good start.




    randy jackson the jacksons. randy jackson the jacksons. randy jackson the jacksons a
  • randy jackson the jacksons. randy jackson the jacksons a


  • tampacoolie
    06-30 05:24 PM
    Nothing make sense here, since USCIS itself preparing for large volume of I485 cases in July. They infact stopped the premium processing effective from July 2nd. So why they have to go back to stone age dates? Moreover, new fee gets effective from July 29 and if anyone files on/after July 29 do not required to shell out AP and EAD renewal fees during endless I-485 approval. If they get everyone filed before july29, then everyone end up with paying AP and EAD renewal fees for next decade. This would generate lots of positive cash flow for USCIS and immigration attorneys. So they must be generating this panic attack to make sure everyone file July first week or second week.

    What a way to make some quick millions here :confused:




    2011 randy jackson the jacksons. randy jackson the jacksons. Randy Jackson upset parents
  • Randy Jackson upset parents


  • Motivated
    06-18 11:34 AM
    donated $50; learned about the organization on June 8, participated in the event - not knowing any of the issues. Was an eye opener to the legislative process. I did not do much, just accompanied the IV members to the meetings - these members were well prepared to present the case as well as to answer questions. I am impressed, and here I am registered and donated.
    Thank you IV for being pro-active. Feels good to be part of the action.



    more...

    randy jackson the jacksons. randy jackson the jacksons a
  • randy jackson the jacksons a


  • rajbgp2002
    07-19 04:08 PM
    http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/backlog_faqs_07-10-06.pdf



    Frequently Asked Questions on Non-Receipt of 45-Day Letters and on the Process for Addressing Related Requests to Reopen
    The Office of Foreign Labor Certification (OFLC) is aware that some employers or their legal representatives who have received �case closed� letters may not have previously received a �45-day� Center Receipt Notification Letter (�45-day letter�) from the Backlog Elimination Center (BEC) processing their respective cases. In additional instances, cases may have been closed after employers or their representatives responded timely to a 45-day letter.
    In the backlog, once the vital information in an application is fully entered into the OFLC database, a 45-day letter is the precursor to further processing of that application; the letter functions both as notice to the employer that its application has come up for full processing in the queue, and as a request for confirmation from the employer or its representative that the employer wishes to continue with the case. In cases where the letter attaches a list of corrections or deficiencies in the application, an employer must correct or address these before processing can continue. When a BEC does not receive a response to its 45-day letter, or this response is incomplete in responding to corrections, it closes the case
    The process and remedy described below are available to employers who believe a case has been closed due to issues surrounding the receipt of or response to 45-day letters, including:
    o Employers who did not receive a 45-day letter after one was issued by a Backlog Elimination Center (BEC); and
    o Employers who believe a case was closed after a timely and complete response to a 45-day letter. This includes employers advised of closure through either a case closure letter or a screenshot.
    This process is not available for applications closed on grounds unrelated to nonreceipt
    of or timely response to a 45-day letter, including applications withdrawn by an employer or its representative; applications for which the response to the 45-day letter was untimely or insufficient; or cases closed for late or insufficient response to any other correspondence or requests other than a 45-day letter. This process is also not an appropriate mechanism for employers, legal representatives, or workers named on an application to inquire about case status or issues not related to case closure. Under any of these additional circumstances, individuals are asked to make use of the more appropriate processes and remedies already in existence at the BECs.
    What should I do if I received a �case closed� letter but no 45-day Center Receipt Notification Letter? What if I responded timely to a 45-day letter but my case was subsequently closed? How can I notify the Backlog Elimination Center that I believe my case was erroneously closed and request the Center to reopen the case?
    Employers who believe one or more of their cases has been closed for reasons covered by this FAQ, and who wish to request those cases be reopened, must take the following steps:
    1.
    E-mail the BEC where the closed cased was pending, the Dallas BEC at reopenrequest@dal.dflc.us or the Philadelphia BEC at reopenrequest@phi.dflc.us.
    2.
    The subject line of the e-mail should read �Request to Reopen�.
    3.
    Please limit each e-mail request to one application or case number; the nature of the process developed to respond to these requests limits to one the case numbers that can be addressed as a result of any inquiry. Employers with requests for multiple reopenings may submit as many e-mails as appropriate.
    4.
    The body of the e-mail must include the following information, to allow the BEC to locate, reopen, and prepare to resume processing the appropriate case:

    Name of employer and correct current address.

    Correct ETA case number, not a case number from a state workforce agency; alternatively, the e-mail should explain why an ETA case number cannot be provided.

    Correct current contact information for the employer�s attorney or agent (including name, address, and e-mail address).

    Name of the alien named on the application.
    The body of the e-mail must describe the reason(s) for the request, that is, why the employer believes the case was closed improperly, such as
    o �I am the employer/attorney on the application described below. I did not receive a 45-day letter but subsequently received a case closure letter.�
    o �I am the employer/attorney on the application described below. I received neither a 45-day letter nor a case closure letter, but the H-1B mailbox indicates my case has been closed.�
    o �I am the employer/attorney on the application described below. I received and responded timely to a 45-day letter but subsequently received a case closure letter.�
    What can I expect in response to my request to reopen?
    Upon each Center�s receipt of the employer or representative�s e-mail request, the Center will issue a standardized, automated electronic notification that the Center has received the request. Response time will vary, depending on volume
    of requests received through this electronic mailbox. The employer will receive a second e-mail informing them of the BEC�s determination to either reopen the case or keep the case closed. If the employer�s request is approved and the case reopened, this second e-mail will include a screenshot of the employer�s case reflecting the case is active. If an application is incomplete, the second e-mail will also include the 45-day letter originally sent to the employer and a corrections list. Employers and their representatives will not be receiving a separate 45-day letter or corrections letter by mail, and should treat these documents as requests for action.
    Employers should review the screenshot to ensure the BEC has reopened the correct case. If the screenshot shows the appropriate application, the employer will be able to confirm that its case is open and being processed because the �case status� section will not say �closed�, but rather another phase of the process.
    How do I respond to the second e-mail from the BEC, containing the screenshot and other information if relevant?
    The BEC will treat the employer�s original electronic request to reopen as the equivalent of a confirmation (in response to a 45-day letter) that the employer wishes to continue processing of a case and, if no additional changes or information are needed, will continue processing the case in the appropriate order.
    If an application was deemed incomplete at the time the BEC issued the original 45-day letter, and the attachments to the electronic response to the employer includes a corrections letter requests the curing of deficiencies, or any additional information, then � as with any 45-day letter � the employer or its representative must provide the additional information within 45 days to prevent further delays or re-closure of the application. Employers must submit such responses in hard copy, through the mail.
    May I contact the BECs by regular mail instead of email?
    No, the request to re-open a case must come into the centers electronically.
    Who may make the request to re-open a case if we believe it was improperly closed?
    Only the employer or attorney of record may make the request to re-open a case. A request from an alien will not be addressed.
    Do I have to submit my request to re-open a case within a certain time period?
    Yes, to be considered for reopening, all requests must be received by a BEC within 30 days of the publication of the policy announcement or within 30-days of the receipt of a case closed letter, whichever is later.
    To whom will responses be sent?
    The email responses will only be sent to the employer or attorney who initiated the request.
    What do I do if I have not received a �45-day� letter by July 21, 2006?
    If an employer does not receive a �45-day� letter by July 21, 2006, email the appropriate Backlog Elimination Center at nobeccontact@dal.dflc.us for the Dallas BEC or nobeccontact@phi.dflc.us for the Philadelphia BEC. The email must contain the following information:
    A. Attorney name and address
    B. Employer�s name and address
    C. Alien�s name and address
    D. Priority Date
    E. State or Regional location and/or number where case was originally filed
    OFLC will publish its policy regarding such cases under separate cover.




    randy jackson the jacksons. randy jackson the jacksons.
  • randy jackson the jacksons.


  • sparky_jones
    09-15 12:52 PM
    Any ideas? (My wife and son are in india now).
    Anyway, I will support IV wholeheartedly going forward. Of course, I got benefitted from it. I am a long timer, 2001, EB3.

    Congrats. Good to see an EB3-I approval. This is something we get to see rarely here. Hope you are able to celebrate with your family soon!



    more...

    randy jackson the jacksons. randy jackson the jacksons
  • randy jackson the jacksons


  • prdgl
    07-07 09:31 PM
    Hi,

    I will be applying for LC in a few days. So, I want to clarify something.

    My ad says MS + 1 yr of experience.

    Question 1: My 1 yr will be prior to my MS so can i use this experience ?

    Question 2: If so Can I show that experience worked back in my country from my very close freind who runs a small software company ?

    He is willing to give me any kind of experince letter and if USCSI calls ready to answer them.

    But just wondering what will be the consequences of doing this. Obviously I can't show any paystubs or W2 forms for that 1 yr.

    What are the other evidences that I may require for this other than employer verification letters ?Please reply, emergency !

    In which stage in GC will they look sriously (does in conitnue till i-485 stage ?)




    2010 randy jackson the jacksons. randy jackson the jacksons a randy jackson the jacksons. hair randy jackson the
  • hair randy jackson the


  • REDS
    07-20 08:28 AM
    I am facing the same situation .My PD is Sep 2003 and my I 140 is pending, recently filed 485 and on top of that i am unmarried, I am scared that my 485might get approved before i get married.



    more...

    randy jackson the jacksons. Austin Jackson, Jeremy Jackson
  • Austin Jackson, Jeremy Jackson


  • ftbakhru
    06-18 03:07 PM
    My experience is that interview dates for Nov won't show up until Oct.




    hair Randy Jackson upset parents randy jackson the jacksons. pictures randy jackson the
  • pictures randy jackson the


  • help43
    09-12 09:58 AM
    Please advise on what documents that i need to submit for H1-B amendment

    1) Previous employer Paystubs
    2) Offer letter from new company...
    3) Previous I-94
    4) I-20 ...
    5)-----



    more...

    randy jackson the jacksons. randy-jackson-michael-jackson
  • randy-jackson-michael-jackson


  • RedHat
    08-30 12:26 PM
    My PD is 2002 Aug




    hot randy jackson the jacksons a randy jackson the jacksons. Marlon and Randy Jackson
  • Marlon and Randy Jackson


  • LostInGCProcess
    11-10 05:05 PM
    Hi,

    Thanks for the reply and sorry for creating multiple threads.

    - First H1B Employer "A"
    -----------------------------
    Approved: Oct 2006
    Stamped: December 2006
    Visa stamp valid till : Oct' 2009
    H1B transferred to Employer "B" : June 2007
    Traveling to India: November ' 2008

    On Dec12, 2007, i saw an update on I-797 from Employer "A" even though
    I have moved to Employer "B" by that time.

    The Status of I-797 for Employer "A" on USCIS website got changed
    to "Cable sent to American Consulate or port of entry notifying them of approval.".

    My concern is that whether the above status means that first Employer "A" has revoked the H1B visa?

    If yes, doesn't that means that I will NOT be able to use that H1B
    visa stamping and *new* I-797 from Employer "B" at port of entry?

    Thanks again..look forward to your response

    You need not worry about your old H1 and also you can use the current visa to enter US as long as it has more then 6 months validity period.



    more...

    house hair randy jackson the jacksons a randy jackson jackson 5 kids. randy jackson the jacksons. dresses randy jackson the
  • dresses randy jackson the


  • seekerofpeace
    10-05 11:05 PM
    that was hilarious GCN007...BTW my wife got approved to finally....

    Years ago or should I say ages ago not even in the US of A but at Heathrow at the American Airlines counter (that time I was a student for MS) the lady was going thru my I-20 and was asking for additional documents et al...so I had this bunch of documents in my folder...and her eyes landed on my degree certificate...she asked me you have a degree from IIT and you couldn't get a job still ? that's why you are going for your MS....i was like well I wanted to do research....why not in India? I was like this is not even USA and this is my 2nd visit to USA (after the Christmas break in the 2nd year)....why are they asking so many questions and this is pre-9/11.....

    I was like why is she harassing me....Do you have intentions of staying back in the USA after you finish your MS....I said no I plan to do my PhD in the UK...She gave me a ugly look and stamped my passport and let me go....

    SoP




    tattoo randy jackson the jacksons. randy jackson the jacksons. randy jackson the jacksons
  • randy jackson the jacksons


  • NNReddy
    08-26 03:24 PM
    Thanks for the reply. So we don't need to disclose to employer that we are on EAD.

    AND
    Also can employer discrimnate EAD, for ex: they won't hire people on EAD, can they do that legally?



    more...

    pictures randy jackson the jacksons randy jackson the jacksons. hairstyles randy jackson the
  • hairstyles randy jackson the


  • rdehar
    07-20 12:26 PM
    Guys, I have been posting this message as a reply on a few threads, I just want to bump up to a separate thread.

    This should come as a reality check for all filers (PD 1995 or PD 2007), all victims of BEC, all guys who are getting married soon and chose not to file I-485, nurses, engineers, physicians and all those who are losing hair from hyper-tension:

    1. The BEC has vowed to clear all backlog by Sep '07 ( I myself got out of it just-in-time, in May '07, after spending 3 years );

    2. USCIS has already announced that this year's GC quota is finished, meaning there will be no more I-485s approvals before next year's quota starts (Oct '07);

    3. Filing I-485 does not equate to approval, USCIS cannot approve I-485 without forward movement of dates and filer's PD falling into that range. However, a I-485 application can be pre-adjudicated ( citation needed );

    4. Almost everyone who can apply for I-485, will apply. This means USCIS has all the data ( all the numbers ) to work with and make a very accurate forward movement of dates from now on. Thus far, they have been making random guesses ( because of labor substitution among other factors? );

    5. Once bitten twice shy, it is highly unlikely that USCIS will make dates 'C' ( for over-subscribed categories/countries EB2 and EB3 for China, India, Mexico and Philippines ) for next few years. They can, however, make forward movement in an orderly fashion. Remember: dates are already 'U' for everyone;

    6. Whenever USCIS moves dates forward, people who could not apply now will be eligible to apply I-485 and/or I-140. These include all people who are still stuck in BEC heck. Older PD always had golden value and will continue to have golden value;

    7. EAD and AP are, however, not dependent on PD. This intermittent relief is a blessing for people with recent PD, which pre-PERM filers never dreamed of;

    Please draw your own conclusion(s).



    By the way,

    *. RIP 'Labor Substitution'. Thank God it is gone. Good riddance. Rules of game just got a lot fairer !!




    dresses Marlon and Randy Jackson randy jackson the jacksons. randy jackson jackson 5
  • randy jackson jackson 5


  • Kevin Sadler
    May 2nd, 2005, 07:50 AM
    Nice shots, Anders. And you're right on track with your thinking about getting wheel spin to really enhance the photos mixed in with a combination of panning shots as well. There is something about wheel spin and motion that really adds to an image. Cox's pic is a great example and dan13 has some good ones in his gallery too. So the question is how much? Just enough is the answer. One of my buddies is a professional auto racing photographer. He's had mag covers and they fly him around to different tracks, even to Japan. So he's the real deal and very good and his published pans are flawless. But he says it's still trial and error and every track condition is different and it still takes a bunch to get a good one. Now he can get dialed in a lot quicker than most of us, but you get the point. Keep slowing it down until you get it. :) Hope that helps a little. Later, Kevin



    more...

    makeup Austin Jackson, Jeremy Jackson randy jackson the jacksons. hair randy jackson the jacksons a randy jackson jackson 5 kids.
  • hair randy jackson the jacksons a randy jackson jackson 5 kids.


  • snathan
    02-11 01:50 PM
    Hi Folks,

    What is the fastest and perhaps a little economic way to get documents over to chennai (Tamil Nadu) or Calicut (Kerala) from here in San Jose, ca.

    USPS has this service called Express Mail ($27.95) or Priority Mail ($12.95)
    I guess USPS is claiming 6-10 days (guess no gurantee) to india.

    Other couriers seems to be $70+ (FedEx, UPS, DHL)..

    Anyone has had good luck with USPS ? or do you suggest the couriers mentioned above ?

    Need to get docs for an interview for parents on Feb 26th in Chennai...

    Thanks in Advance for your reply !!

    USPS is cheap and best...


    There is one more thing even cheaper...

    put it in a water tight bottle and throw it to the pacific ocean...and pray it will reach chennai.:D




    girlfriend randy jackson the jacksons randy jackson the jacksons. Photo Find: The Jacksons
  • Photo Find: The Jacksons


  • laborpains
    09-15 12:58 PM
    Any ideas? (My wife and son are in india now).
    Anyway, I will support IV wholeheartedly going forward. Of course, I got benefitted from it. I am a long timer, 2001, EB3.

    Congratulations! Just curious did you got any RFE as it is a very early PD? I'm Jan 22 2002 EB3-I and am waiting with bated breath.




    hairstyles randy-jackson-michael-jackson randy jackson the jacksons. randy jackson the jacksons.
  • randy jackson the jacksons.


  • user1205
    09-05 12:05 PM
    From http://www.immigration-law.com/Canada.html

    List of Witnesses To Testify at House Judiciary Immigration Subcommittee Hearing Tomorrow

    The list:
    Congressman Jeff Flake, R-AZ, co-sponsor of STRIVE Act of 2007
    Congressman Joe Beca, D-CA
    Congressman Ray Lahood, R-CA
    Congessman Brian Bilbray, R-CA
    Tony Wasilewsi, Small Business Owner, Schiller Park, IL
    Eduardo Gonzalez, U.S. Navy Petty Officer Second Class, Jacsonville, FL
    Rev. Luis Cortes, Jr., President Esperanza USA
    Joshua Hoyt, Executive Director Illinois Coalition for Immigrant & Refugee Rights
    Cassandra Q. Butts, Sr. Vice President for Domestic Policy Center for American Progress
    David Lizarraga, Chirman of U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce
    Julie Kirchner, Director of Government Relations Federation of American Immigration Reform
    Corey Stewart, Chairman At-Large, William County Board of Supervisors, FL

    The list indicates that the skilled worker immigrant worker community is not well represented in this hearing. We will post the text of the testimony as soon as it becomes available.




    LostInGCProcess
    06-15 04:25 PM
    So the dates are moving ahead but what does this really imply ? With priority dates retrogessed to around 2000 and no visa numbers availble for EB3. Who is getting the GC. Is it only the Eb2 with PD around 2000 or any one else.

    Does anyone has more info to better understand what these dates imply ?

    It is only the unfortunate souls from India (including me :( ) and China who are not getting the GC's. Rest of the world are getting....that includes Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan etc....I wish I was born there so that I could have fallen on ROW category. :-)




    logiclife
    02-01 06:40 PM
    It doesnt matter who the President is, on issues of legal skilled immigration.

    Immigration reform, like any other big reform, needs changes in laws, which needs initiations and actions from CONGRESS.

    In Congress, we have a presistent problem of a filibustering senate.

    What we need in 2008 elections is the kind of senators who oppose us to lose elections and pro-immigration senators to win elections. Not only that, if one party gets over 55-57 senators, then filibuster threat is mitigated severly, because its easy to find 3-4 senators from minority party to break ranks and vote FOR a particular bill or amendment.

    So what you need is a heavily tilted senate that has over 55 senators of just one party so that they can overcome filibuster and legislate big fixes for a change rather than naming post-offices and passing budgets.

    The senate has 100 seats, with each senator facing election every 6 years. So each election cycle (every 2 years) there are one third of senators facing re-election.

    This time, there are 34 senators facing re-election. Out of this 22 are Republicans and 12 are Democrats. Republicans have more seats to defend then Democrats. Plus about 4-5 Republicans are retiring so its easier to pick up those seats for Democrats than to beat a sitting senator.

    If a Democratic tide takes place, then senate could tilt heavily Democratic in 2008 and would take care of filibuster issue where each measure needs 60 votes to pass. Nonetheless, you have to remember that Democrats or Republicans are easily divided when legislating immigration and it has a way of dividing parties like no other. Last year, Immigration CIR bill faced opposition from both sides - Republican and Democratic.

    THIS IS NOT AN ENDORSEMENT OR SUPPORT OF ANY KIND FOR ANY PARTY OR CANDIDATE. IV is NEUTRAL AND IT ALWAYS HAS BEEN.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment