yabadaba
11-14 05:01 AM
Guys
Please chk this URL its about lame duck session . I know its dated Nov 9th but still.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/B?r109:@FIELD(FLD003+d)+@FIELD(DDATE+20061109)
it says this.
November 15 and 16, Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims, oversight hearings entitled ``The Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act: Are We Fulfilling the Promise We Made to Cold War Veterans When We Created the Program?'' (Parts IV and V), 2 p.m., on November 15 and 10 a.m., on November 16, 2141 Rayburn.
I m confused with above details.
Aj
they are having an oversight hearing on a program that places cold war veterans in energy occupations and they were subject to illness. remember "Claims" in Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims.
Please dont get confused so easily. They have more important matters than a few thousand skilled immigrants
Please chk this URL its about lame duck session . I know its dated Nov 9th but still.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/B?r109:@FIELD(FLD003+d)+@FIELD(DDATE+20061109)
it says this.
November 15 and 16, Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims, oversight hearings entitled ``The Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act: Are We Fulfilling the Promise We Made to Cold War Veterans When We Created the Program?'' (Parts IV and V), 2 p.m., on November 15 and 10 a.m., on November 16, 2141 Rayburn.
I m confused with above details.
Aj
they are having an oversight hearing on a program that places cold war veterans in energy occupations and they were subject to illness. remember "Claims" in Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims.
Please dont get confused so easily. They have more important matters than a few thousand skilled immigrants
wallpaper A few weeks ago, Tyler Perry
rirelachenrisa
04-21 03:16 PM
Hi,
I am really confused about my current status.
I am currently on Opt Extension, which expires on June 1st 2010.
When i filed for H1b visa last year April 2009.
I got my petition approved, but my change of status was denied.
The reason was stated as :
The status previously accorded the worker had expired before this petition was filed. Therefore, the worker si not eligible for change of status.
Now, I am still in US. Is my status illegal?
I am really confused about my current status.
I am currently on Opt Extension, which expires on June 1st 2010.
When i filed for H1b visa last year April 2009.
I got my petition approved, but my change of status was denied.
The reason was stated as :
The status previously accorded the worker had expired before this petition was filed. Therefore, the worker si not eligible for change of status.
Now, I am still in US. Is my status illegal?
GC_ASP
09-25 12:01 PM
Does anyone have format of the CFO letter for ability to pay?What is the format of the CPA letter?thank you
2011 Movies of Tyler Perry
MatsP
February 13th, 2009, 04:06 AM
This obviously depends on the reason it was refurbished, but I would expect that most refurb cameras are warranty returns that have been fixed of whatever the warranty problem was. Since the repair would replace the failed part, it would be fair to say that they are at least as good as the original one (and if it's a "common problem part" then it's even likely that a new, better part has replaced the faulty part, which would make it BETTER than the original one).
And obviously, with consideration for the reputation of the company, I would expect that Nikon doesn't sell refurbished cameras that have any notable faults (scrapes, scratches, dust, etc) - if the damage isn't in an easy to replace part, the camera is probably used for scrap parts for other repair projects, or just destroyed.
Of course, I would check what the terms and conditions for returns, refunds and warranty is - are you paying less because you get less warranty, or simply because it has 10 or 100 exposures on the "clock", or because you get less warranty or other rights to complain?
--
Mats
And obviously, with consideration for the reputation of the company, I would expect that Nikon doesn't sell refurbished cameras that have any notable faults (scrapes, scratches, dust, etc) - if the damage isn't in an easy to replace part, the camera is probably used for scrap parts for other repair projects, or just destroyed.
Of course, I would check what the terms and conditions for returns, refunds and warranty is - are you paying less because you get less warranty, or simply because it has 10 or 100 exposures on the "clock", or because you get less warranty or other rights to complain?
--
Mats